Friday, September 16, 2011

Sewer Issue Spill Over

As part of the furious political battle to determine who will be seen as the least-taxingest candidate since biblical times and in any universe, a side-issue has emerged which verges on something of urgency:

Democrat Rich Fitzgerald accused Republican D. Raja of doing a "bait and switch" as a Mt. Lebanon commissioner by promising to lower taxes while running for office and then, once elected, imposing a sewage tax on residents. (Trib, Tony LaRussa)

Or if you prefer:

Mr. Raja, [Fitzgerald] argued, has not owned up to a monthly sewer fee he approved in Mt. Lebanon last year. (The Republican says it was offset by a simultaneous drop in property taxes.) "What you get from me is you get the truth about what we're going to do," Mr. Fitzgerald said. "What you get from him is a bait and switch and he gives you half the story." (P-G, Timothy McNulty)

We hope Mr. Fitzgerald effectively communicates that his beef is with hypocrisy, not with the wisdom of upgrading sewers and establishing drainage protocols. The creation of a regional "storm water management district" is something that public officials have been discussing for at least a year, and has recently been lent new urgency for obvious reasons. Water flow is something that cannot possibly be managed effectively on a municipality-by-municipality basis or a Good Samaritan volunteer-basis. Many consider such regional management to be desperately necessary and a timely challenge in a region with three rivers, 8,792 streams, mountainous topography and burgeoning new concrete and asphalt developments all over the place.

The very fact that our probable next head of Allegheny County is loudly trumpeting that sewer fees should really be regarded as just another tax, is something that is politically unlucky. We should all hope Fitzgerald and his campaign staff aren't accidentally painting the man into a corner from which he will later need to maintain that sewer investments and drainage regulations are outrages in and of themselves.


  1. Mr. Fitzgerald does not have a beef with hypocrisy. If he did, he would not trade so freely in it.

    A tax raised for a good reason, which is offset by another tax cut, is not half the story. It's the whole story. Half the story is what Mr. Fitzgerald is peddling in this case.

    Which is actually a step up for him, since, to date, his policy prescriptions are less of a story than anything found in a Clifford the Big Red Dog book.

  2. Maybe I should have voted for the guy on the gas pumps?

  3. Just like his position on reassessments, Fitzgerald's stance here shows a scary level of stupidity and childishness

  4. The reassessments thing, I feel like we've all beaten into the ground. I assume there must be solid evidence showing nobody can be elected Dog Catcher without cursing property reassessments as pure concentrated evil.

    We should hope whoever wins immediately goes back on their word. Maybe the judge can order a SWAT team or better yet a SEAL team into the County Office Building, so as to provide the next County Executive with sufficient political cover to do their job.

  5. This topic really STINKS! "A Bud Light With Lime" for all!

  6. Thinking it is time to privatize all Authorities. Oh, my bad.., Parking Authority, does a good job! Well, I guess we'll hear from City Council: again?

  7. Every summer he goes and leaves comments on a blog about the Hamptons.