Let me start out by saying that I am one of those socially liberally and economically conservative voters. However, more and more I think that any time I hear "privatize" or even "public private" partnership I think of bad things. This my friends is the essence of bad government. I am becoming a strong believer in government should do the things government does and private sector should do the thing the private sector does. Deciding where to draw the line is the tricky part. But despite the fact that everyone likes to use the words "partnership" and "collaborate," when it comes to taxpayer money and private profits they should be dirty words. When private companies get cozy with government it is difficult to pry them apart and separate the dollars. We need a new direction. Government is ok owning things and ok running programs. Likewise, private capital and investment is a good thing and so is profit. Just be careful mixing them all together and expecting a special brew.
I don't like to make them "dirty words", but I certainly agree with "be careful".
Especially when entire er, subsections of the wider public sector go in for privatization en mass like prisons and military support. A lot of times I think it's because we want them to do things that government can't as easily do with plausible deniability. In Pittsburgh, why are all the high school kids with behavioral issues going to a privately managed school that is non-unionized?
All views expressed in these posts and in my own comments are my own and my own alone, and do not reflect the views of any of my employers, clients, partners or patrons, past or present, real or imagined. Adding comments is a privilege, not a right. The blog author reserves the right not to publish or to remove comments for any reason, which most often will include obscenity, harassment, personal attacks, "outing" people, attempts to make the blog unpalatable to others, ASOIAF book spoilers, incessant semi-coherent rambling, and malicious and/or knowing falsehood. However, the blog author is under no obligation to do so in a timely manner or in any other manner whatsoever, and is in no way responsible for any comments written on this blog by other parties. Please fact-check everything you read relating to politics scrupulously, especially on the Internet and especially in blog comments and on message boards.
Let me start out by saying that I am one of those socially liberally and economically conservative voters. However, more and more I think that any time I hear "privatize" or even "public private" partnership I think of bad things. This my friends is the essence of bad government. I am becoming a strong believer in government should do the things government does and private sector should do the thing the private sector does. Deciding where to draw the line is the tricky part. But despite the fact that everyone likes to use the words "partnership" and "collaborate," when it comes to taxpayer money and private profits they should be dirty words. When private companies get cozy with government it is difficult to pry them apart and separate the dollars. We need a new direction. Government is ok owning things and ok running programs. Likewise, private capital and investment is a good thing and so is profit. Just be careful mixing them all together and expecting a special brew.
ReplyDeleteI don't like to make them "dirty words", but I certainly agree with "be careful".
ReplyDeleteEspecially when entire er, subsections of the wider public sector go in for privatization en mass like prisons and military support. A lot of times I think it's because we want them to do things that government can't as easily do with plausible deniability. In Pittsburgh, why are all the high school kids with behavioral issues going to a privately managed school that is non-unionized?
I'm just glad the PG found some decent opinion columns to repost. The in-house group is beyond tired.
ReplyDeleteBrian O'Neill still has a pretty fair batting average.
ReplyDeleteBut yeah, they could stand to inject some competitiveness into that market.