Friday, November 9, 2007

The Phantom Menace

and/or, the Puzzle of Polarized Pittsburgh

Everybody was right. (BR, Comet, MR, PG)

Ravenstahl won with about 63% of the vote to DeSantis's 35%.

On the one hand, it was a historic degree of success for a Republican mayoral candidate, unequaled in more than 40 years.

On the other, Luke didn't need to break a sweat.

Although voter identification with Democrats was as high as to be expected in Pittsburgh, it should be noted that DeSantis managed this feat against a backdrop as ugly for the Republicans as ever existed.

The Iraq War. Torture. Katrina. Let's not forget Santorum! DeSantis might well have been more successful running on the Vampire Child Molester ticket, than with the GOP.

Yet for all that, more than one in three Pittsburghers were happy to pledge allegiance to the House of Dubya, rather than the House of Luke.

But let's not go nuts.

Ravenstahl triumphed with a 28 point margin. He debated an opponent on seven occasions, and got to drop balloons at the end of it all. He emerges from this with more political capital than he started, at least among the general population, which counts for something.

Problem is, we had been working so hard and for so long to raise the roof, it was impossible for us in the final moments to somehow slam the brakes, establishing a reasonable level of expectations.

##

I would be remiss if I did not thank all the bloggers, in the Burghosphere that is our wonderful city -- and you created a thriving and vital online community in this city, and I thank you for that.
-- DeSantis concession speech (AS)

It was all downhill from there.

First came the predictable recriminations on the Burgh Report. Not to mention a few dismissive comments by on-air pundits. Then came the City Paper analysis. And the Brian O'Neill piece. We even picked up on a bit of blog-on-blog violence on Null Space.

We the bloggers have been exposed as frauds and fools! Out of touch! An echo-chamber! Elitist! Negative! So much hot air!

That last part, unfortunately, has had more than a kernel of truth to it as of late. For you see -- and this will come as a shock to many of you -- several among us were cynically crafting our messages in order to engineer favorable results for the challenger.

No, really!

Actually, we should not make light of it. The Comet maintains in all sincerity that we never told any fibs, nor wrote anything we did not mean, or would desire to take back. Nor did we read anything like that elsewhere.

However, it was clear that more than a few of us were willfully engaging in spin, acting as surrogates, swashbuckling with the paid politicos, and discovering what muscles we had to flex.

After some unexpected victories in the primary election, it was a tempting prospect. And it was fun while it lasted!

As it happened, we discovered that although blogs maintain a certain modest power to drive issues and generate buzz, we are fundamentally ill-suited for strategic public relations. Thank goodness. The world has enough problems.

The strength of the bloggers, at their best, lies in unadulterated authenticity -- real human voices, each one unique -- often desperate for some reason, but usually with humor, and admirably sincere.

##

What were the voices of the Burghosphere trying to say? That we needed to keep the heat on. That we weren't done yet. That we wanted everybody to stay focused on local government, in between Bill Peduto's withdrawal, and the birth of the new City Council.

And that we did not quite trust the powers-that-be during the interlude.

We were also saying that we meant it back in May when we said we desired reform. That we are cognizant of the city's finances, and are mistrustful of half-measures. That we are interested in big ideas, and uninterested in old ones. That we are tired of government by-the-employees, for-the-employees.

That we like to see the rules both enforced and observed for their own sake.

And most especially, with a few major decisions on the horizon that will shape Pittsburgh for decades to come, it was no time to take a time-out.

A minor example -- not our favorite, but a clear one -- from the first debate:

Mr. DeSantis said he would mandate that both the new casino on the North Side and the new arena in the Lower Hill meet the U.S. Green Building Council's criteria for environmental certification, known as LEED, for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.

Mr. Ravenstahl said the casino, being built by Don Barden, is not using public money and "he is not compelled to build a green building." (Ann Belser, P-G)

Since then, Ravenstahl and his development czar Pat Ford have taken a more strident tone with Mr. Barden, suggesting they may in fact use the City Planning process to compel LEED certification. We shall see.

##

What we're saying is -- if there's a degree to which we all used Mark DeSantis (and we do not except the MSM in this!) to keep pressure on the current mayor and the whole political apparatus, and to keep Pittsburgh focusing on Pittsburgh long enough that it can actually learn something about itself -- we are guessing he was a more-than-willing accomplice. Well played.

##

Speaking of learning something about Pittsburgh -- and speaking of eschewing public relations in favor of unabashed sincerity -- we made a request of the gentleman from Null Space, that he make one alteration to his already-famous 2007 Mayoral General Election map, in order to make it fully perfect:


Now you understand everything. There is Blue Pittsburgh -- affluent, educated, well-informed, liberal, and small.

And there is Red Pittsburgh -- not as much any of those things.

We have even learned that Red Pittsburgh enjoys country music to a degree that Blue Pittsburgh does not relate.

##

There is just one detail that distinguishes polarized Pittsburgh from our polarized republic at large: the black communities hereabouts are decidedly red. Is this an opportunity for Blue Pittsburgh?

Surely, the progressives (or the liberals or reformers or whatever you want to call them) must naturally believe that underprivileged, disenfranchised minorities stand to gain much more under their way of running government. If they would just listen!

We now know beyond a shadow of any doubt that such an endeavor requires extensive dues-paying and ground work. That it requires more than a few outdoor press conferences in the months prior to an election. That you can expect some serious, in-your-face backlash before you gain any traction.

Maybe it's not worth it.

Maybe Blue Pittsburgh needs to navigate around the black communities, down the riverbanks, through Lawrenceville to the North Shore, and also down the South Side Flats, where the pickings all seem easier. Once the liberals gain power, they can demonstrate the effectiveness of their ideas to the black population.

Because they're so good at alleviating poverty, having done it successfully a million times.

##

Maybe there's a simpler answer to all this. Maybe Blue Pittsburgh just needs a strong political athlete, equipped with both a killer instinct and a natural charisma.

(Maybe we'd better keep looking at the map.)

9 comments:

  1. "Maybe there's a simpler answer to all this. Maybe Blue Pittsburgh just needs a strong political athlete, equipped with both a killer instinct and a natural charisma."

    Excellent post. You forgot to add "Democrat" to your description of the ideal candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Downright excellent work. Having heard you speak on the radio, and seeing how well you think on your feet, and knowing that you have established roots across a variety of socio-economic strata, I think maybe you could become something of a "political athlete" in your own right.

    The only comment I can offer about the post itself is in response to this part.

    However, it was clear that more than a few of us were willfully engaging in spin, acting as surrogates, swashbuckling with the paid politicos, and discovering what muscles we had to flex. [snip...]

    As it happened, we discovered that although blogs maintain a certain modest power to drive issues and generate buzz, we are fundamentally ill-suited for strategic public relations. Thank goodness. The world has enough problems.


    I can't speak for anyone else at all on this point, but I know that I'm not playing some kind of game with this blogging thing. I'm not looking to "spin" things in hopes of producing some kind of "strategic public relations" victory.

    I certainly am not seeking to become either the covert or overt surrogate of any political candidate, even the ones that I believe in. In my ideal world, my writings would piss every candidate off at some point. That's the only way to challenge them to re-think some of their entrenched positions.

    And that's precisely why I reacted so very damn badly to Chris Potter's comments over that the Burgh Report. I'll grant that, for the first time in over a year, someone finally got me mad -- and it happened to be somebody that usually agree with.

    But I'm really, really, not investing countless hours of my life in this so that I can stump for any particular candidate. And I honestly don't do this because I'm hoping to change anybody's minds. I'm not a PR machine for anyone. Not Mark DeSantis. Certainly not Luke Ravenstahl. Not even the enemies of Luke Ravenstahl. And not -- this is the part that's going to seem really weird -- even for my own damn self.

    I don't give a toss what the public perception or reaction is concerning myself or my writings. I'm not making any money from it. I have no advertisers to satisfy. I am -- to borrow a phrase -- absolutely "nobody's boy", including my own.

    All I do is put my writings and analysis out there. For some reason that probably qualifies as some kind of mental disease, it gives me adequate satisfaction to know that the details of my positions are out there for all to see, unencumbered by any filtering that would go on if I tried to communicate them through any other means. If other people find it interesting, that's a bonus. If other people find it informative, that's an even bigger bonus. And if anyone actually changes their mind on the basis of my writings, then they really need to consider seeking medical help.

    I started blogging because I was sick and tired of all the political labels out there, especially since I never seemed to comfortably fit into any of them. I knew I was exactly a "Republican", or a "Democrat", or a "liberal", or a "conservative", or an "east-end republicrat" or a "yinzer". The media, desperate to condense the story into the smallest sound-bite people, simply isn't interested in folks like me, because my views are -- like everyone's, I think -- hopelessly complicated and unsuited to easy descriptions.

    So instead of trying to figure out if I'm a better fit for the "pro-this" or the "anti-that" labels, I decided to just put my views out there. In part, simply so that I could communicate that real people's viewpoints really don't ft into just two tidy little boxes, even if our available choices are usually pretty binary when we get to the voting booth. Most viewpoints, even on a single issue, don't even fall exactly along a single linear continuum. These things are far to complex, at least in my case, to be described easily by someone else. So I took responsibility for doing it myself.

    I would have voted for DeSantis. My posts openly acknowledged that. But I wasn't his surrogate. I wasn't spinning. I was just telling people how I felt. That was my only goal, and that one I accomplished. My goal was never to influence this or any other election, especially in Pittsburgh. That kind of ambition would be hopelessly and depressingly impossible to achieve, and I've never even attempted to make it my own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I will say during your Retrospective posts, I was waiting for you to drop the big elbow. It never came. So I guess that's pretty fair evidence that you don't fancy yourself a spinmeister.

    "All I do is put my writings and analysis out there. For some reason that probably qualifies as some kind of mental disease..."

    I think Delano alluded to this once. And you notice the touchy Burghosphere did not see fit to respond? Illuminating ... other than that, Adm, you embarrass me. Matt H is the model for a blogger / candidate in these parts, we'll see how that goes first...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I admit that my blogging was pro-DeSantis and anti-Ravenstahl, but I would like to think that I did more than just cheer lead since I was able to cover this race from the DeSantis campaign side since almost day one, and I was able to cover a lot of the events and campaigning where the MSM was not present.

    Pretty much all 100+ of my posts are up there so you can see I did for yourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You forgot one important part of your list of DeSantis supporters' characteristics ("affluent, educated, well-informed, liberal, and small"): white. It is DeSantis supporters' most important and defining characteristic after affluent, and the two are of course connected.

    Note that the black districts on your reverse map are the most "red."

    ReplyDelete
  6. I freely admit to calling myself an "activist blogger."

    To me, that means that I advocate for causes, candidates and issues that are important to me.

    I do this online as well as off line.

    What's the use of having a blog if you don't have a point of view?

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is worth noting that African Americans are also the most reliably Democratic of voters.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As to whether the blue sections merely represent "Republican" or "DeSantis" territory, see link:

    http://angrydrunkbureaucrat.blogspot.com/2007/11/election-2007-con

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think the Burghosphere had a huge impact, and that impact will only increase as time goes on. Political discourse, no matter how it happens, will increase political participation.

    The real problem is that the senior citizen straight democrat ticket voters aren't the most net-savvy folks in the world...

    ReplyDelete